返回首页
 【公告】 1. 本网即日起只接受电子邮箱投稿,不便之处,请谅解! 2. 所有文章的评论功能暂时关闭,主要是不堪广告骚扰。需要讨论的,可到本网留言专区 
学界动态 |  好汉反剽 |  社科论丛 |  校园文化 |  好汉教苑 |  好汉哲学 |  学习方法 |  心灵抚慰 |  好汉人生 |  好汉管理 |  学术服务 |  好汉网主 |  说好汉网 |   English  |  学术商城 |  学术交友 |  访客留言 |  世界天气 |  万年日历 |  学术吧台 |  各国会议 |  在线聊天 |  设为首页 |  加入收藏 | 

好汉网主 好汉网主
THE POST-CONFLICT DEMOCRATIZATION DILEMMA
时间:2009/2/20 9:04:13,点击:0

Using the cases of U.S. democracy-building efforts in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo, I show that the U.S. faces a post-conflict democratization dilemma in both instances. 

Democratizing countries engulfed by intra-state conflict needs to be a central tenet of the foreign policy strategy of liberal democracies in order to enhance their security. Yet, domestic politics in liberal democracies constrains their ability to execute post-conflict democratization in a comprehensive fashion.  This constraint posed by domestic politics in liberal-democracies, on post conflict democratization policies, undermines their democracy-building efforts, leading to a state of continued instability in the previously conflict-torn region.  Such conditions of instability (Kosovo), and in some cases, relapse into conflict (Haiti), further exacerbate security concerns of liberal democracies and threaten international stability. This is the fundamental democratization dilemma facing liberal democracies: the need to engage in post-conflict democratization to prevent intra-state conflict and the inability to do so, which, in turn, makes it even more essential for them – liberal democracies – to engage in democratization.

The current literature on democratization/state-building focuses on conflict-torn regions, and largely ignores political dynamics within liberal-democracies like the U.S., who are responsible for crafting post-conflict democratization policies.  By focusing on the domestic political dynamics associated with democratization in the U.S., I try to bring attention to this, largely ignored, aspect of post-conflict democratization.  This focus, on domestic political dynamics, may enable policy-makers in liberal-democracies to be more sensitive about their own constraints while engaging in post-conflict democratization, which may aid in the formulation of more effective policies.  Failure to enact efficacious post-conflict democratization policies can be potentially disastrous, as was demonstrated by the 9/11 attacks.  I believe it is critical that liberal-democracies realize the need for democracy-building in failed states and try to resolve, or mitigate, the worst consequences of the post-conflict democratization dilemma, for their own security, and for maintaining international order.

点击下载浏览该文件20092209257475

分享到新浪微博+ 分享到QQ空间+ 分享到腾讯微博+ 分享到人人网+ 分享到开心网+ 分享到百度搜藏+ 分享到淘宝+ 分享到网易微博+ 分享到Facebook脸谱网+ 分享到Facebook推特网+ 【打印】【关闭
上一篇: Who Dares Wins : Confidence and S..
下一篇: Joseph S. NYE Jr.
相关评论

我要评论
查看所有评论内容
评论内容